Home
>
[F] Golden Rules
>
[FA] Recognise Achievement
|
Previous
Next
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
It's easy to think
that the reviewer is going to produce a long list of criticisms and
direct instructions for the project team to 'do better', but this
is not the case at all.
|
The review process
is one of mutual exploration of how the project is doing and that
includes what is going well, not just what needs to be
improved.
|
Achievements are
treated in 'strategy formation' in just that same way as bad
performance. Both create 'actions' that should have an actual
effect on the project.
|
|
|
|
|